Quote 1
"As you can see, wearing a helmet increases the distance
over which the acceleration occurs which dramatically reduces the rate of
acceleration for your head and the magnitude of the mutual a/A forces acting between
your head and the concrete sidewalk to 1/4 their former helmetless value.
Meanwhile the forces of gravitation are limited to only about 1% of the forces
present during this head-impacting event. I hope by reading this answer to
your fine question, R.S., many parents around the world will benefit by
insisting that their children always wear safety helmets complete with an
effective chin strap anytime there is a risk
of impact to the head." (Question 2: The
Forces of Impact after a Fall.)
Quote 2
"While you may think that I have gotten lost in answering
your question, J.T., I want you to know that you have already been presented
with the answer as to why different objects on Earth fall at the same
rate. It is not as complicated as one might think. But rather than
point out the answer just yet, I want to discuss the reasoning behind the
answer." (Question 11: Why Objects Fall at the
Same Rate.)
Quote 3
"A Cause For Uniform Motion Is Expected
"For 16 centuries,
Aristotle's "mover" satisfied the general need for a cause to explain
uniform motion. Clearly, Galileo's causeless understanding of uniform motion
failed to satisfy this need. But then Newton's "inertia" cause was
readily accepted as representing the expected answer. Credit goes to Galileo for
recognizing the causeless truth. With the demise of Aristotle's
"mover" and now Newton's "inertia", can we resist inventing
yet a third imaginary "cause" solely to satisfy the illogical but
enduring general need for one?" (Article
PR1: Is Inertia Real or Imaginary?)
Quote 4
"Next one may wonder what has to happen to an
inactive object in rest-motion to cause it to become active? Acceleration
is the answer. If an accelerative force (Newton's LAW I) is impressed upon
the object, the object will immediately experience a change in its speed,
direction, rate of rotation, or as many as all three at once. An
accelerating object is an active object. An object in rest-motion is an
inactive object. Therefore, rest-motion is the opposite of acceleration
which, conversely, is the opposite of rest-motion." (Article
II: The Equality of Rest and Uniform Motion, paragraph 11)
Quote 5
"Galileo is best known for his
light-hearted ability to question, dismantle and reassemble all of man's
creations that, for him, lacked sensibility. Against his intellect and
wit, no nonsensical concept could stand firm. If we learn anything at all
from Galileo let it be this unusual ability of his. Question Everything -
Accept Nothing. I say "unusual" for ironically, the polar
opposite, "question nothing, accept everything" is the standard guide
by which a student is most likely to succeed in ascending through the ranks of
the modern version of the ancient science of Physics." (Article
IX, Galileo's Law of Constant Acceleration, paragraph 9)
Quote 6
"Understand that the first and
foremost indication of a false theory is if it's acceptance requires the
abandonment of truth and logic. The truth is always true, and logic is always
upgradeable through improvements in understanding. Thus logic is forever
logical. Beware of any "solution" that runs counter to your own common
sense. Common sense is amazingly sensible." (Article
III, The Equality of Opposing Forces, Author's Commentary)
Quote 7
"If the history of science teaches us anything, it teaches
us that there is, at best, little association between having one's way and being
successful in accurately describing that which is real and true." (Question
5 - Centrifugal Force)
Quote 8
"By his own words,
Einstein reveals here that Newton's imaginary "inertia" is
confusing his mind while preventing him from recognizing the reality of
the acceleration/Reaction forces that are present and recognized in his turntable event as "centrifugal force". In effect,
Einstein has offered up these two terms, for the reader's consideration,
without his having any true understanding of the meaning of either one."
(Article VI - Gravitation = Acceleration?, paragraph 39.)
Quote 9
"Conclusion: There exists no such event as outward-directed "centrifugal acceleration". Also
there exists no force capable of acting as the cause of the imaginary non-event of "centrifugal
acceleration". (Article XI: Reaction
Forces, paragraph 46.)
Quote 10
"Conclusion: Acceleration/Reaction forces are the only
reaction forces that exist in nature. Acceleration/Reaction forces are
present in identical nature in all accelerational events, such as in linear
events where an object's speed of motion is changing or in circular events
where the object's direction of motion is changing. Reaction forces
exist nowhere else. This means that while non-acceleration/Action
forces exist, such as the n-a/A force you are impressing against each end of
the marble-filled Action Force Loop, there is no such thing as a
non-acceleration reaction force." (Article XI: Reaction
Forces, paragraph 52.)
Quote 11
"So much of an absolute nature has been given up by
the acceptance and adoption of Albert Einstein's Theory of Relativity that
little is left to provide dependable support for thoughts of Physical
events. It is as if Modern Physicists have been left with little more
to stand upon than a small chunk of Artic ice that is floating in the direction
of temperate
waters. Any analysis of the Coriolis effect based upon the Modern Physics'
interpretation of events is doomed by confusion right from the start." (Question
14 - Coriolis Confusion, paragraph 2.)
Quote 12
"An astronaut is standing on a compression scale inside a
rocket that is about to begin its acceleration from the launch pad at Cape
Canaveral. Just before the rockets are ignited, the external force the
astronaut is freely bearing against the scale is 165 lb.f. of gravitational
weight. Sometime after liftoff, as the rocket expels fuel matter, its
rate of acceleration reaches its maximum. Now the external force the
astronaut is freely bearing against the scale equals 825 lb.f. While
physicists associate the astronaut's new weight with his gravitational
weight back at the launch pad by referring to his new weight in the
accelerating rocket as being the equal of 5 gravitational weights, no
satisfactory explanation of the additional downward-directed 660 lb.f
is given. The additional upward-directed 660 lb.f is no
mystery. The role of this acceleration/Action force is made perfectly
clear by Isaac Newton's formula F = mass * acceleration. But the
mutual 660 lb. reaction force sourced from within the accelerating astronaut's
body is not acknowledged within the teachings of the science of Modern Physics.
Instead the "free body diagram" technique is employed to cover up this general
lack of understanding. " (Article XI - Reaction
Forces, paragraph 54.)
Quote 13
"Hopefully by now you have come to realize that while the
only reaction forces that exist, acceleration/Reaction forces, are never the
cause of any event, their reactionary presence is often measurable, by one
method or another, in many accelerational events." (Article
XI - Reaction Forces, paragraph 55)